How are they doing things differently?
- Learning is not didactic, but through the co-management of specific patients in these primary care practices (case-based learning).
- In exchange for co-management support, primary providers are expected to become the local specialists for these conditions in their community (and also receive free CME).
- The specialty interdisciplinary team (e.g., pharmacist, psychiatrist, hepatologist) virtually “rounds” with the primary practices, so that all practitioners simultaneously learn best practices (as they implement them) and become a practice ‘community.’
- Clinical outcomes are centrally captured and shared.
Key requirements:
- The “de-monopolization” of specialty expertise-- finding specialists (and subspecialists) who inherently believe that complex conditions can be managed in the primary care setting.
- Interested primary care providers willing to spend the extra time (2 hours weekly) to participate in an ECHO and provide consultations to other local providers.
- The condition should be common, require complex management, with evolving treatments/medications, high societal impact (health and economic), serious outcomes of untreated disease, and ability to significantly improve outcomes with disease management.
- Initial outcomes are promising, as evidenced by their recent NEJM article, which demonstrated similar Hepatitis C treatment outcomes in the community when compared to the tertiary care center (almost unheard of).
The model is being spread to: addiction management (via buprenorphine), rheumatology,
and CHF. It also has been used to also train medical assistants, peer support staff; and, the infrastructure, once in place, can be used for rapid dissemination of information (e.g., H1N1 information).
The most aggressive adopters are the VHA and DoD.Most replication sites are rural, but the University of Chicago is using the model with local federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) to support hypertension care.Even UNM is using ECHO to better support care in their local FQHCs and feel that they are now much more effective at triaging patients into specialty care visits.
To date, however, the model seems to be implemented in settings where specialists are salaried and play an active role as educators.
To date, however, the model seems to be implemented in settings where specialists are salaried and play an active role as educators.
Did I miss it, but I did not find any way to contact you regarding inputs of innovative ideas to improve health care for patients with multiple chronic conditions while saving valuable healthcare resources? I have such a "win/win" suggestion I would like to discuss either by email or in person.
ReplyDeleteRobert Weiss M.S. UCLA
Lymphedema Patient Advocate
National Lymphedema Network, San Francisco
LymphActivist@aol.com
Robert, the intent of this blog is to highlight strategies being used by organizations to deliver better care, more cost effectively. We are not actively soliciting proposals in chronic disease care.
ReplyDeleteYou can learn more about our proposal guidelines here: http://www.chcf.org/grants.
CHCF also has an innovations fund that invests in scalable solutions for underserved populations. To learn more: http://innovations.chcf.org/index.php/fund/.
Best of luck.